€40,000 /MW/year
That is how large the gap can be between two identical batteries. Entirely driven by operation: multi-market access, peak shaving and alignment with your energy contract.
TRANSPARENCY INSTEAD OF PROMISES
Revenues are never guaranteed. That is why we show what our steering actually delivers, month after month, and build every case with before-and-after numbers.
Reduce investment risks: Simulate scenarios before investing and make data-driven decisions.

That is how large the gap can be between two identical batteries. Entirely driven by operation: multi-market access, peak shaving and alignment with your energy contract.
WHAT WE PUBLISH
✓ Monthly steering results. What the pool earned, per market, without cherry-picking the good months.
✓ Anonymised cases. Sites described by sector and profile, never by name, with before-and-after numbers.
✓ The misses too. Months where the market gave little are shown like any other. That is what makes the good months credible.

Antoine Delhaye — Head of Flexibilty
WHAT DRIVES THE GAP
The gap between two identical batteries is not luck. It comes from five operational choices, each worth real money on its own.
01
Which revenue streams your battery can access — and which you’re currently missing.
02
How your market trading interacts with grid tariffs — the net picture, not just the revenue side.
03
Whether your energy contract is enabling or blocking your flexibility revenue.
04
What joining a 30 MW pool (140+ MW pipeline) could add to your individual returns.
05
A battery inside a large virtual power plant earns both its stand-alone revenue and the pool effect on top. In our data the VPP effect added around 25% extra revenue.
Single-market steering leaves most of these levers untouched. Stack all five and the gap between two identical batteries runs up to €40,000 per MW per year.
PROOF
Every euro we publish sits inside a documented case, with the site's own contract prices and constraints next to it. That way a number always comes with its context.